ThinkNavi prioritizes the question a method addresses, its procedure, evidence, and limitations over its popularity or brand name. Some thinking methods are studied extensively in academic research; others spread mainly through professional practice. We will not present both as if they had equal empirical support.
Distinguish theory, evidence, and practice
A theoretical explanation, an experimentally supported effect, and a story about one successful workshop are different kinds of claims. Where possible, we cite original works and published research and specify the population or conditions behind effectiveness claims.
No universal recipes
Many creativity methods are human-designed aids rather than laws of thought. Following every step cannot guarantee an insight, and a rigid sequence may narrow a question prematurely. Combining methods—or declining to use a formal method at all—can be sensible.
AI assistance and sources
AI-assisted writing still requires editorial checking. We aim to quote sparingly and identify original works, researchers, and publication years. Until a tool’s actual data flows and storage design are documented, we will not promise that users’ confidential input stays local or is never transmitted.